logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
SNAPS "perpendicular adjustment question
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Art Smith  
#1 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:20:12 AM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
while attempting to establish a perpendicular with SNAPS from the vertices of a spline curve, some perpendiculars are shown and most are not.............. how do I adjust the SNAPS perpendicular settings to get perpendiculars from all of the spline's vertices ?? see attached image

Art Smith
[email protected]
Art Smith attached the following image(s):
perpendicular SNAP adjustment question.jpg (41kb) downloaded 15 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Art Smith  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, June 6, 2017 2:29:08 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
in the absence of Aeropack source code, I'm guessing the "create airfoil" tool uses the selected leading edge and trailing edge to deduce the required chord, then uses a set of equations similar to those found at Airfoil Tools (http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/naca4digit) to calculate a set of points for the upper and lower surface, and then connects each set of points with a spline. clearly then the spline doesn't pass through each of the points creating a challenge for the "perpendicular snap". if the points along the upper and lower surface defining airfoil spline were equally spaced, the problem could be simply overcome by distributing equally space points along the spline curves and using them in lieu of the calculated points. the points however are NOT equally spaced, they're cosine spaced to pack more points into the front of the airfoil where there's more curvature !!!

hence the question on how to "help" the perpendicular snap tool.................

Art Smith
[email protected]
Back to top
Tim Olson  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, June 6, 2017 4:08:00 PM(UTC)
Tim Olson

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
United States

Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
>> clearly then the spline doesn't pass through each of the points

Hi Art

The equations for the airfoils came from Theory of Wing Sections. The points that are calculated from the resulting equations are then fit using a B-Spline. They are fit to within 0.0005 inches.

The difference you may see on the screen may be due to the display list. The display list is the visual representation of the equation to the screen.

To get the best displayed curve try using Edit : Resolution : Super Fine: Precise.

This is an option for equal point spacing along the curve (not wrt chord) to complement the cosine distribution. The cosine distribution typically does a better job at the leading edge.


Tim

Edited by user Wednesday, June 7, 2017 4:28:49 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Tim Olson attached the following image(s):
fit.png (156kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
eqaul.png (270kb) downloaded 16 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Tim Olson
IMSI Design/Encore
Back to top
Tim Olson  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, June 6, 2017 4:18:55 PM(UTC)
Tim Olson

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
United States

Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
>>how do I adjust the SNAPS perpendicular settings to get perpendiculars from all of the spline's vertices ??

LogiCursor perpendiculars are calculated from the current cursor location back to the curve. I'll add in a Perp from location into PowerPack for you, something I have been meaning to do.


Tim


Tim Olson
IMSI Design/Encore
Back to top
Art Smith  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, June 6, 2017 5:38:45 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Tim-

thanks!! I've used the "equal" spacing option when only a cartoon/graphic is needed; it's cosine spacing whenever parts will be machined to the solid model.

"Theory of Wing Sections" is a great deal more readable than the original NACA reports which will never be mistaken for Tom Clancy or Raymond Chandler.....!!

Art Smith
[email protected]
Back to top
Art Smith  
#6 Posted : Monday, June 12, 2017 4:02:27 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
a "Shout Out" to Tim and the team for the recent changes that fixed my normals problem!! the improved capability/new tools are a HUGE step forward !!!

Art Smith
[email protected]
Art Smith attached the following image(s):
new tools a huge step forward.jpg (37kb) downloaded 15 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Tim Olson  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:42:57 AM(UTC)
Tim Olson

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
United States

Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Awesome!

Video showing the minor tweaks in SharkCAD Pro 1341 for AeroPack: NACA airfoils and new PowerPack: Line Perp.

http://www.csi-concepts.com/Demo/videos/NACA.mp4

Tim
Tim Olson
IMSI Design/Encore
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET