Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
General
»
tangency to "cut section" perimeters
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
cutting a solid cylinder with the "cut section" tool yields the vast majority of the time an ellipse, or probably more correctly a perimeter that looks like an ellipse. how do I establish a line tangent to a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse and a co-planer circle ??
if there's not currently a way to do it directly, is there a way to extract the major and minor axis from a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse??
Art
[email protected]
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 9/24/2014(UTC)
Posts: 373
Thanks: 8 times Was thanked: 104 time(s) in 85 post(s)
I did this the other day, scaled ellipses are recognised as splines so I wanted to define the figure as ellipse. Apply a bounding box to the spline, the major and minor axes can be measured from the edges of the box.
1 user thanked murray for this useful post.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Murray-
thanks, very clever!! hadn't thought of a bounding box approach. "of course" it took a few more steps because the ellipse isn't aligned with the current work plane.... fortunately verify also provides max & min principle axis so a box can be constructed to enable replacing the perimeter that looks like an ellipse with a real ellipse. convoluted, but it gets there.....
Art
[email protected]
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,252
Location: Paris & Frankfurt
Thanks: 217 times Was thanked: 164 time(s) in 101 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith if there's not currently a way to do it directly, is there a way to extract the major and minor axis from a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse??
[email protected] Hello Art,
I'm sorry to say : a scaled ellipse is not an ellipse any more.
And it's been like this since the time of Pythagorus, or maybe earlier...
I know because I did this mistake before.
Try other ways...
JL
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
JL-
yes, but it's plenty good enough for estimating "clearance" center lines routing tubes.... it was a CAD mechanization question, not geometry.
Art
[email protected] Art Smith attached the following image(s):
RF-00 up and back exhaust.JPG
(42kb) downloaded 6 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,252
Location: Paris & Frankfurt
Thanks: 217 times Was thanked: 164 time(s) in 101 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith yes, but it's plenty good enough for estimating "clearance" center lines routing tubes.... it was a CAD mechanization question, not geometry.
I understand now.
Great routing job Art !
Thanks,
JL
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
JL-
thanks! the postulated structural tubes had a huge impact on the degree of difficulty and the quality of the eventual solution. the triangular tubes pushed the exhaust aft AND pushed the point of maximum frontal area aft. without the structure "in the way", normally tube #3 defines maximum width. frontal area and taper ratio are really BIG deals in everything that influences aero drag......
Art
[email protected]
Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
General
»
tangency to "cut section" perimeters
Forum Jump
Punch! CAD
ViaCAD & Shark
- News and Announcements
- General
- 2D Drafting
- Surface Modeling
- Solid Modeling
- Subdivision Modeling
- Rendering & Display
- Import/Export
- Tips and Tutorials
- Suggestions
- Gallery
- PowerPack
- Punch Lounge
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.