logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Art  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 7:49:35 AM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
The Mesh parameters box has changed with new options. I wonder if anyone has a reliable list of STL settings that they use. I think I used to use:

Surface Deviation .0005
Normal Deviation 2.5
Edge Length 0.0
Aspect Ratio 2.5
With STL facets checked.

I seem to be getting files almost double in size with Shark 7.

Also did I read that the display settings have an effect of the mesh export?

Should I adjust nodes or use adaptive facets?

Anyway, if anyone has settings that are working well, could I get the settings?

Thanks in advance,

Art OS 10.6, Shark FX

I just started using the settings listed above and could not produce any file (4kb) went back to default and got something.
misterrogers  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 8:33:34 AM(UTC)
misterrogers

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 444

Hi Art,

The only experience I have with rapid prototyping is with a FDM, and I always leave the STL facets unchecked. File size is almost always the same as the original. Haven't had a problem yet, and get extremely accurate results.
Art  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 8:39:40 AM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks for the reply.

These drawings are for FDM. I have always checked stl facets. I am mystified by the settings (although I know what they do). I was hoping to be able to find settings at a rapid prototyping website, but the Shark settings seem unusual.

Art

OS 10.6 Shark FX
Jean-Francois Jacques  
#4 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 12:35:11 PM(UTC)
Jean-Francois Jacques

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/25/2009(UTC)
Posts: 833
Canada

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 21 post(s)
I do many Rapid Prototyping. Check with your RP Vendor, I send my files in ACIS-SAT and my RP Agent make is own set up for their machine.

Image-1 is my original in STL.
Image-2 is my ACIS-SAT file translated to STL by Pronto Prototyping inc.
Jean-Francois Jacques attached the following image(s):
image001.jpg (27kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
image002.jpg (45kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
METEORE DESIGN / KEKO Stand
Jean-Francois Jacques, Industrial Designer
SharkCad Pro V14 B1653
Platform macOS 14 Sonoma
NickB  
#5 Posted : Monday, September 13, 2010 12:52:58 PM(UTC)
NickB

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/19/2007(UTC)
Posts: 501

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I do the same as Jean-Francois, and always send the vendor a SAT or STEP file. The vendor is then responsible for the conversion, and can tweak things for optimum results on their machine and with the material that we are using. I like to let the expert be the expert rather than messing with stuff I have little knowledge or control over - their machine / process.
Shark FX 9 build 1143
OS X 9.5
3.6 GHz Core i7, 8GB, GTX 760 2GB

matter.cc
Art  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:11:27 AM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks for the advice. I ended up sending a step file and it went fine and much better that the troublesome stl exports. I do not know what the results will be however, since I had no control.

This makes it difficult to deal with a wide variety of vendors.

Tim, can I get some guidance?
My current products are all smaller than a breadbox. I have ruined models and money by using the default. The last document that I have on appropriate conversions is from Ashlar which was fine until the latest changes in interface.

I can't find any info on "mixed/fringe, adaptive facets and adjust nodes". I guess I don't really need to know what they are, I really need parameters. Sort of like a preset "environment". "Use this setting for a small precision part under 12" cube". Or even better "these settings are at the limit of resolution of and FDM machine" Boy, that would be great and I imagine do-able.

Are there not others in my situation?

Thanks in advance,

Art

OS 10.6 FX 7
misterrogers  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:45:08 PM(UTC)
misterrogers

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 444

Originally Posted by: Art Go to Quoted Post
Thanks for the advice. I ended up sending a step file and it went fine and much better that the troublesome stl exports. I do not know what the results will be however, since I had no control.

This makes it difficult to deal with a wide variety of vendors.

Tim, can I get some guidance?
My current products are all smaller than a breadbox. I have ruined models and money by using the default. The last document that I have on appropriate conversions is from Ashlar which was fine until the latest changes in interface.

I can't find any info on "mixed/fringe, adaptive facets and adjust nodes". I guess I don't really need to know what they are, I really need parameters. Sort of like a preset "environment". "Use this setting for a small precision part under 12" cube". Or even better "these settings are at the limit of resolution of and FDM machine" Boy, that would be great and I imagine do-able.

Are there not others in my situation?

Thanks in advance,

Art

OS 10.6 FX 7



I'm going to have to second that.. I am not familiar with those terms either. The program manual that I have doesn't have an explanation for those settings - only discusses the slider settings.
Tem  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:10:25 PM(UTC)
Tem

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/21/2007(UTC)
Posts: 386
Man
United States

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
I had a SLA made by www.stereolithography.com
It was a first pass, turned out good for its intended purpose.
On their website are many information webpages.
Check them out.

Tem
posh.de  
#9 Posted : Thursday, September 16, 2010 4:58:47 AM(UTC)
posh.de

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 484
Germany

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 50 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Go to Quoted Post
I do not know what the results will be however, since I had no control.

if you wanna have control over facetting incl. a visual feedback do the meshing inside Shark by using "Edit > Change Object Type... > Mesh..." and export then.

hth,
Norbert
misterrogers  
#10 Posted : Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:53:30 AM(UTC)
misterrogers

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 444

Originally Posted by: Tem Go to Quoted Post
I had a SLA made by www.stereolithography.com
It was a first pass, turned out good for its intended purpose.
On their website are many information webpages.
Check them out.

Tem




Thanks Tem, how fast is their shipping in the U.S.?
Tem  
#11 Posted : Friday, September 17, 2010 10:33:41 PM(UTC)
Tem

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/21/2007(UTC)
Posts: 386
Man
United States

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Sorry for the slow response. I have been busy the past few days.
Stereolithography.com delivered in about 3 days in the US.
They communicated often, each major step was detailed enough.
If you find anyone better, please post.
Honestly, I don't remember the settings I used.
misterrogers  
#12 Posted : Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:37:09 AM(UTC)
misterrogers

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 444

Hi Tem,

In the past for scaled prototypes, I've sent stuff to Shapeways. I believe they are located in Europe, though its been very easy dealing with them. Prices are reasonable, and shipping is prompt. They'll email you right away if there's a problem with geometry and usually try to fix it themselves.
jlm  
#13 Posted : Sunday, September 19, 2010 2:54:24 PM(UTC)
jlm

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,252
Man
France
Location: Paris & Frankfurt

Thanks: 217 times
Was thanked: 164 time(s) in 101 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Go to Quoted Post


Surface Deviation .0005
Normal Deviation 2.5
Edge Length 0.0
Aspect Ratio 2.5
With STL facets checked.

I seem to.


Hi Art,
I do a lot of SLAs with shark STL export.
The Hi Def Epoxy type to get maximum accuracy on small parts.
I get very good service from Ossola 3D in Italy (24 hours delivery in Paris).

My settings are usually :
Surface Deviation .002
Normal Deviation 5 for parts having smooth curves, and up to 30 for parts having plenty of tiny radius blends...
Edge Length : Default
Aspect Ratio : Default
With STL facets checked.

I got this by trials and errors, and am not sure it's optimal.

Please Tim, can we get advise or tutorial ?

Thanks,

JLM
Art  
#14 Posted : Sunday, June 5, 2011 9:44:14 PM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Sorry, I did not even know you posted until I checked tonight with the same old problems....Vendors saying my translations are lousy... I will try your settings tomorrow and look to see how my parts will come out.

Is there anybody else that makes their own STLs? I would rather have command of this stage rather than rely on vendors.

Art

Shark FX 967

OS 10.6
NickB  
#15 Posted : Monday, June 6, 2011 12:33:22 AM(UTC)
NickB

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/19/2007(UTC)
Posts: 501

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Shapeways has a nice [URL="http://www.shapeways.com/tutorials/viacad"]tutorial[/URL] on using ViaCAD to create an STL, and then tuning the mesh parameters for proper STL output.
Shark FX 9 build 1143
OS X 9.5
3.6 GHz Core i7, 8GB, GTX 760 2GB

matter.cc
Art  
#16 Posted : Monday, June 6, 2011 8:14:10 AM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks Nick.


Do you know what "adjust nodes"

"Adaptive facets" and the mixed/fringe setting do?

Art

Shark FX
billbedford  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:59:30 AM(UTC)
billbedford

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/19/2007(UTC)
Posts: 186

Nothing, if you have the STL file box checked.
Art  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, June 7, 2011 7:45:46 AM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks, good to know I am not missing some critical feature.

Did you figure this out or is there some documentation?

Thanks,

Art

Shark FX 10.6
Art  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:11:51 PM(UTC)
Art

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/15/2007(UTC)
Posts: 284

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
My stl settings do not make large files like they used to. I have not changed my settings in years and yet the exports that used to be 150+ mb are now under 2mb. So my models are no usable. I know others usually use service groups to do this conversion for them, I cannot. Does anybody make fine quality stl files and have settings that they can pass on. This is only an issue I have had in the past 8 months or so. for years before that I used the same settings (the actual numbers are in my first post above).

Thanks in advance.

Art

Shark FX 7 967

10.6.8

If there is somewhere I can send the file for experiments, that is fine, I am tired of fooling with this.
la mouche  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, March 28, 2012 1:29:15 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757

Hello,

maybe this help you

http://www.shapeways.com/tutorials/viacad

Antoine
Users browsing this topic
Guest (10)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.