You can't get parametrics like that anywhere else for $99. Surfaces and solids developed in VC/Shark are interoperable through .sat, IGES, step. It does basic 3D pdf, and can "collate" other pdf pages to the model page. Also does some variation on model-to-sheet which I haven't looked at so can't comment on how it works. I've used free Design Xpress for four or five years when I've needed the parametrics, which is full-featured but limited to 10 or 25 parts, depending on the version. I'm buying come Monday, too good to pass up. It's dedicated MCAD, the comparison to SolidWorks is valid, although of course it isn't comprehensive. Parametrics aren't very conducive to conceptualisation or freeform surfacing. It's complementary to other CAD, not alternative.

Wait 'till you get to 1000! :eek: :D:D


I downloaded Alibre, and I hated it. It really reminded me of Pro/Engineer, not Solidworks. Actually, believe it or not, Shark reminds me of Solidworks! (Just one heck of a lot more fiddly. :mad: )

Tom,

Pro/e, especially the WF 5 version, is a good package for big projects, and not having tried Alibre, I can't speak for the comparison, but it appears to me that Alibre is attempting to mimic SW. (BTW, Pro/e WF 6 is getting the CoCreate treatment so expect it to compete head to head with NX Synchronous technology (2nd quarter 2011)).

But Shark reminding you of SW? How so?

Obviously Shark is and needs to evolve, but I would hope that it doesn't go down the path of SW, which caters to the mid range by throwing the kitchen sink of features at it.

It is my opinion that SW has become bloated attempting to compete with Catia, NX, and Pro/e. It requires too much real estate for the UI and really needs a makeover. Sure, you can customize the UI, but you still end up with a feeling that there isn't a holistic approach to the interface. SW would do well to create a version from scratch for Mac OSX, but that won't happen.

Which is why I still like and use Shark, even though it needs some more fleshing out, and even though I have to turn to SW and Pro/e for higher end MCAD. I'm waiting for SharkFX V6.0 with quite a bit of anticipation.

the other tom

Hi, Tom

Can you explain a little what high end MCAD functionality/features you would want to see?


Thanks

Jason

I'd have to agree with everything that tmay is saying.

Believe it or not, I've been commissioned to design and build some back garden dwellings (sheds to you and me), I've I've been using ViaCAD to design and assemble them. The ability to have proper 3D parametric constraints on assemblies and sub assemblies would be an absolute boon.

It would also be wonderful to have those sheetmetal tools too- especially for making up bespoke joist hangers etc.

I suppose, I'll just have to make with and put up?! :rolleyes:

Might I suggest one of the fine Punch! Architectural products for your building commission...

On a serious note, it would be useful to be able to pull in a Punch! Architectural model as a backdrop in a rendering scene or as a "part" to use in ViaCAD or Shark, though I wouldn't expect to be able to edit the model. Different niches, but a little cross pollination might provide some unexpected benefits.

the other tom