logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
copy of Shark FX9 for sale - $2000 + shipping - copy of Shark FX9 for sale - $2000 + shipping
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Art Smith  
#1 Posted : Thursday, January 21, 2016 5:15:27 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
my Shark FX9 CD, registration code, and electronic copy of ViaCAD Tips, Tutorials, and Techniques by Tim Olson for sale for $2000 plus shipping from 93555. I've decided to accelerate my planned migration to SolidWorks. while not a Shark FX9 package specific problem, lack of anthropometric modeling support is none the less a serious problem for a near term project.

Art
[email protected]
Back to top
Art Smith  
#2 Posted : Monday, February 15, 2016 12:44:11 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
anyone with a friend or company that needs a copy of Shark FX9 ??

Art
[email protected]
Back to top
solidtooldesigns  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, February 16, 2016 3:49:49 PM(UTC)
solidtooldesigns

Rank: Guest

Joined: 1/22/2016(UTC)
Posts: 92

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Your call, but I don't think Solidworks is a winner IMO. There are other constraint/parametric modelers that are cheaper and arguably better (Try ZW3D). Cumbersome, buggy, surfacing is not as strong... I initially learned 3D design on Solidworks and have used it for the last 9 years and only continue to use it because of customer demands. That is one major benefit, it is very popular. It's drafting is really nice too. I haven't played much with ViaCAD / Sharks drafting to compare.

Aside from drafting which to be honest I haven't tested much in ViaCAD, I would take ViaCAD and certainly shark over SW anyday. I'm not even taking price into account where ViaCAD and Shark are clear winners.

Edited by user Tuesday, February 16, 2016 4:37:12 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
magicart  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:17:20 AM(UTC)
magicart

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/20/2015(UTC)
Posts: 192
Man
Poland

Thanks: 95 times
Was thanked: 69 time(s) in 39 post(s)
I agree with Solidtooldesigns! Solidworks, Inventor are not really better than Shark IMHO. All these programs where you build parts, assemblies and sheets separately are not intuitive for me.

JB
Back to top
WWW
posh.de  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:34:37 AM(UTC)
posh.de

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 484
Germany

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 50 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Apples and Oranges... SolidWorks, Inventor/MechanicalDesktop, Alibre, Creo/ProE, Solid Edge, NX (to name the common) are MCAD modelers whereas Shark/VC is targeting a free, direct modeling for conceptual purposes. If functionality as e.g. parts/assemblies or formula driven constraints or specialized stuff as e.g. sheet metal or cinematics/animations etc. is required, a MCAD modeler is simply the right tool for the job... sure, fiddling around can be done always but workarounds are typically time consuming.

But anyway, with a recent official retail price of U$ 2,296.- and the discounts available with more or less every newsletter *sigh* the invoked pricing seems to be a little optimistic to me.

Also would check if the Shark EULA does allow to sell the license and if Punch! will transfer the license to a new licensee?

Edited by user Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:40:51 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
WWW
solidtooldesigns  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:10:00 AM(UTC)
solidtooldesigns

Rank: Guest

Joined: 1/22/2016(UTC)
Posts: 92

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
If VCAD/Shark are not going to have constraints then I think they should just dump the parametrics and go straight direct modelling. The software already has all the great direct modelling tools, IMO it could use a little tweaking with them but the foundation is there.

I've made suggestions for more features but honestly I would rather see bug fixes and a little more development with the features it has to improve work flow and customization. This really is a very powerful software.

While I feel Shark is a little pricey as posh.de mentions, VCAD is very affordable. Overall I'm very happy with the power for the price.

magicart I couldn't agree more about all the different assemblies and parts, sketch modes... these are not intuitive. One level like VCAD/Shark is the way to go. I defended SW for years before giving other softwares a real try. Once, I did, I never looked back.
Back to top
Antoine  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:28:27 AM(UTC)
Antoine

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 10/14/2014(UTC)
Posts: 219
Man
Switzerland

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 26 post(s)
Hello,

Challenge:

2'35'' for this model.
All parametric.

GO! test with another softwares :)

http://www.screencast.com/t/GLDPHMRW

Antoine
Antoine attached the following image(s):
challenge.png (105kb) downloaded 9 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
dayer-design.ch
mrconcepts.ch
SharkFX 12
Back to top
WWW BLOG
posh.de  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:56:23 AM(UTC)
posh.de

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 484
Germany

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 50 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
... should just dump the parametrics and go straight direct modelling.

recent Shark is direct modeling (only)...

Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
While I feel Shark is a little pricey as posh.de mentions

I neither said nor meant this.

Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
...assemblies and parts, sketch modes... these are not intuitive. One level like VCAD/Shark is the way to go.

if MCAD functionality is explicitly required, a MCAD modeler is obvioulsy the right way to go... regardless of ease of use.

Edited by user Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:57:02 AM(UTC)  | Reason: formatting
Back to top
WWW
solidtooldesigns  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:21:04 AM(UTC)
solidtooldesigns

Rank: Guest

Joined: 1/22/2016(UTC)
Posts: 92

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Sorry posh I misunderstood your statement about the pricing. You meant that it is light ?

ViaCAD is still parametric. I'm pretty sure shark is too. I recently tried the trial for shark and it was parametric. Do you mean constraints ? Parametric refers to history based (feature tree) to my understanding.

Which do you mean by MCAD functionality being required ? Native formats ?
Back to top
posh.de  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:57:23 AM(UTC)
posh.de

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 484
Germany

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 50 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
You meant that it is light ?

no, I meant what I've written.

Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
Do you mean constraints ? Parametric refers to history based (feature tree) to my understanding.

I meant parametric dimensioning/formulas and geometrical constraints driving the geometry but not the features with editable parameters.

With "direct modeling" in CAx applications typically a creation of geometry without being required to define parametric dimensions or constraints is meant, using parameters for the dimensions of geometry and features of course.


Originally Posted by: solidtooldesigns Go to Quoted Post
Which do you mean by MCAD functionality being required ?

already elaborated above.
Back to top
WWW
solidtooldesigns  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 10:34:36 AM(UTC)
solidtooldesigns

Rank: Guest

Joined: 1/22/2016(UTC)
Posts: 92

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I apologize. English is clearly not my strong suit.
Back to top
Art Smith  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:32:25 AM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith Go to Quoted Post
while not a Shark FX9 package specific problem, lack of anthropometric modeling support is none the less a serious problem for a near term project.


as stated in my original post, my problem isn't with Shark FX. my problem is the lack of third party plug-in's for Shark! if you need anthropometric modeling capability and it isn't offered for your current CAD package, you have two choices: 1.) develop the anthropometric capability yourself; or 2.) change CAD packages. I purchased Shark FX to get more capability in large part because I'd found ViaCad 7 easy to use (ie: Shark FX uses the same GUI) and solid (ie: very few bugs/features).

Art
[email protected]
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET