logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Craig  
#1 Posted : Friday, January 22, 2016 1:09:48 AM(UTC)
Craig

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2009(UTC)
Posts: 383

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 42 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Shark does not use the available resources properly, I do not know if this is a Windows only problem but many times while waiting for the program to complete a task, I open up Task Manager and the processor usage is around 30% with the ram usage at around 25%.

With this in mind I did some research on efficient modelling practises and came up with a few things that may help people, if you have any nuggets of information please share them here.

Do not model assemblies, model individual parts and then import them into a final assembly.
Only use radiuses and chamfers if you really have to.
Use threaded parts at your peril, both external and internal threads add a lot of information.
solidtooldesigns  
#2 Posted : Friday, January 29, 2016 5:39:16 PM(UTC)
solidtooldesigns

Rank: Guest

Joined: 1/22/2016(UTC)
Posts: 92

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I find for the softwares I've used things that cause software to bog down is when people add fasteners and hardware that is often times not really necessary for the design purposes. Another thing is 3D text. Along with the tips you've already mentioned I find all these things can add a lot more "information" to an already large design.
Craig  
#3 Posted : Saturday, January 30, 2016 2:07:26 AM(UTC)
Craig

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2009(UTC)
Posts: 383

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 42 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Very well said, a customer of mine signed off on the very simple attached design of a test rig, he did not need to see all the details as they will be added to the individual parts drawings.

Keep it simple should be everybody’s motto.
File Attachment(s):
TestRig.jpg (768kb) downloaded 17 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Craig  
#4 Posted : Saturday, January 30, 2016 2:16:57 AM(UTC)
Craig

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2009(UTC)
Posts: 383

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 42 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Use sub layers instead of putting individual parts on their own layers and don’t forget to use the compact function when your design is at the stage where you can get rid of all the history and deleted parts.
Tem  
#5 Posted : Monday, February 1, 2016 10:51:44 PM(UTC)
Tem

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/21/2007(UTC)
Posts: 386
Man
United States

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
I have a short story to tell, its CAD related, but not necessarily SharkFX related (SW2009 actually). Way back, I was working as a subcontractor on a large project that was being worked on across continents.
I would receive updates to assembly and part files overnight. The CAD jockeys "over there" would pride themselves on adding lots of details. One morning I woke up to a very long download that tied up my DSL connection for hours. So I went surfing for a few of those hours to get some much needed exercise. When I returned to working on the file it had ballooned. The assembly and parts files had crept up to a gigabyte file. The graphics card had major issues with this, granted it was not a high end workstation level card, but the computer really struggled to do anything. So, the guy who was slightly underpaying me at the time to do his work demanded that I upgrade my computer, I had said no. He offered to loan me a computer, I also said no. He then had the other CAD jockeys remove the threads, and other details that were causing all of the problems and advised them to put that all back in later. I quit woking for him soon after. There is one image that I always flash back on about that project and is the strange video distortion, almost like gained glass or fracturing in multiple colors while trying, and waiting for, those assembly files to rotate one step at a time. My current computers can more easily handle such file sizes, but I tend to work on smaller projects now. I hope this wasn't a waste of time. Ill admit that it was probably somewhat boring and vaguely factual, but its time for me to read to my little one. Good night!
Craig  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, February 2, 2016 1:25:33 AM(UTC)
Craig

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2009(UTC)
Posts: 383

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 42 time(s) in 36 post(s)
Hahaha, yeah these CAD jockeys do love their details.

Check out the attached screenshot, I was working for Renault F1 at Enstone when one of the machinists came and showed me a part similar to the one displayed in the attached image.
The clown who “designed” the part was one of these who had spent 4 years at uni and thought he knew it all.

When they took him the drawing and questioned his design he asked in a smart voice, “what’s the matter, can’t you machinists do a simple job like that?” to which they replied, “sure we can, we can drill it and then go in with a small boring bar and interpolate the counter bore”.

“So what’s the problem?” he asked, the reply was “how the hell are you going to put the bolt in?”
Craig attached the following image(s):
Screenshot (22).png (159kb) downloaded 11 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.