logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
two rail sweep solid (#1997)
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
la mouche  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:07:43 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
Hello,

Do you have a better way to build this volume?

gasp!:eek:

more this! (same problem?)

http://forum.punchcad.com/showthread.php?t=1970

PLease see the attached files.

Thank you.

Antoine
File Attachment(s):
1.sfx.zip (141kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
la mouche attached the following image(s):
1.jpg (141kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
zumer  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:07:57 AM(UTC)
zumer

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 515

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Yes, but I have ViaCAD, not Shark. If you post a VC file of your curve primitives, I can see two or more ways of doing it other than rail sweep.

murray
Back to top
Steve.M  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:13:06 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: zumer Go to Quoted Post
Yes, but I have ViaCAD, not Shark. If you post a VC file of your curve primitives, I can see two or more ways of doing it other than rail sweep.

murray

Hi murray,

VC will import the shark files, I have just done that to check this problem.

- Steve
Back to top
Steve.M  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:16:37 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi Antoine,

This result from the 2 rail sweep is very bad. Such basic functions should work correctly, without this, then I cannot trust the application to correctly do any higher functions.

I am just creating a post to better explain my thoughts and findings.

- steve
Back to top
dexter  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:31:17 AM(UTC)
dexter

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/19/2007(UTC)
Posts: 128
I tried it with the Two-Rail Surface, as well, without much luck (in ViaCAD).
Back to top
WWW
la mouche  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:38:25 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
Hello,

another way for this problem.

See please the attached files.

3 step.

But...not with the twoo rail sweep, strange.:confused:

Thanks.

Antoine
la mouche attached the following image(s):
1.jpg (98kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
2.jpg (174kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
3.jpg (104kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Steve.M  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:43:12 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
There should be no need to look for workarounds for this. On a 2 rail sweep the profile should retail the tangency to the rails, or at the very least there should be the option to retain tangency.
Back to top
zumer  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:51:36 AM(UTC)
zumer

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 515

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
2-rail's a bust, but skinning between the two ellipses and thickening the surface created works fine - for this shape.
zumer attached the following image(s):
skin then thicken.jpg (55kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Steve.M  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:04:26 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I have just spent the last 15 minutes or so putting together a post to report this bug in the beta section, when I finished and "submit reply" the forum logged me out and deleted the post. Even the forum software is a bit of a joke.
Back to top
la mouche  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:05:07 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
Olala!

Murray, you are, may be, the person for my problem, waiting since ... 2 years.

http://forum.punchcad.com/showthread.php?t=1970

The solution volume is desperate, you could give me the procedure that the surface?

See please the attached file.

Thank you in advance.

Antoine
File Attachment(s):
test.sfx.zip (7kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Steve.M  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:52:21 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: la mouche Go to Quoted Post
waiting since ... 2 years.




2 years :eek: I would personally of dumped the software and moved to a cad system that has basic functions working correctly.
Back to top
zumer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:49:04 AM(UTC)
zumer

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 515

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Antoine, the only part of this file that gives any real pause for thought is the top surface. I drew two closed curves around the inner and outer upper vertices of the vertical profiles and skinned a surface between them. Then thickened that surface. The thickened solid's walls aren't vertical, but you can extrude the curves vertically to trim the solid. Trim the bottom of the solid with the world workplane. Now it's very late and goodnight!
zumer attached the following image(s):
test.jpg (51kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
zumer  
#13 Posted : Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:19:58 AM(UTC)
zumer

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 515

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Okay Antoine, here's your shape. The attached file shows how it was made. Two solid ellipses extruded, then the inner one subtracted from the outer. The top surface was made by extending the top lines of the profiles, then drawing inner and outer curves that overlap the body. A net surface made from those two curves, then thickened to solid, which is subtracted from the ellipsoid body. Lots of hoops to jump through, and things don't always work the way you'd expect - which is how we got here from birail sweeps. And bear in mind that VC doesn't have surface booleans, so I've had to take the long way around for some actions.
File Attachment(s):
test1.vc3 (327kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
zumer attached the following image(s):
test1.jpg (62kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
la mouche  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, February 3, 2009 3:34:43 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
hello,

thank you for your proposal.

indeed it requires many operation.

I hope the ... will be corrected.

... it works perfectly with .. (cobalt) oops.

Best regards.

Antoine
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET