I'm interested to see how it plays out, IMSI have done the same thing with TurboCAD, which historically had the same sort of flexible license that you could install on many devices, but they didn't have enforcement signing like Rhino, they moved to one install with an ambiguous purported second "backup" install, that they ultimately wouldn't enable unless you approached them. Which is arbitrary and dishonest IMO. That might be due to the Dassault Systemes and Siemens licenses for translators and constraints. If it is, that would open up new debates about whether or not it's worth it. I don't know the current situation, but there's a post from about six years ago that specifies that the CATIA, NX and other translators don't work in MacOS, and no telling what's going to happen with Windows on ARM, although that might even be something to do with the restricted V14 malarkey. Some time ago, I suggested on TurboCAD's "wish list" suggestion thrad that secondary installations should be offered as opeions, even if it's at some extra cost. They have done that, and I took it up but it's not great value: the second install is 50% of the cost of the first, I don't think I'll take that again. Another thing that IMSI's done is restrict the "save back to" version of TC, too. For years it was only one version back, then between V21 and 2017/2018 it was extended to save back five versions, but recently only one or two again, so it wouldn't surprise me to see PunchCAD being limited like that. The "new rendering engine" in PunchCAD V14 is probably LuxCoreRender, TurboCAD has also abandoned Lightworks for Lux, the results look good but it might not be easy to use to get those. However, if IMSI's prepared to go to open-source for rendering, they could do worse than looking at FreeCAD's constraints. They're 2D, like the Siemens/D-Cubed constraints used in PunchCAD and TurboCAD, but I find them more informative and again, perhaps easier to use than IMSI's implementations.
A couple of years ago, I had some conversation with a guy named Steven Hollister. He wrote a boat modeller program called ProSurf, and its slightly-less-full-featured relative Pilot3D. In recent times, he's been working on a framework for program interaction, not in the traditional CAD interop sense, but from what I understood, an environment that multiple programs could work together within, perhaps something like the connections between 3DSMax and its plugins, or perhaps Keyshot with CAD apps, some sort of live linking. The theory is that the best tools of various apps could be used in some conjunction, instead of the proprietary jealousy that drives a lot of stuff now. Perhaps that's just starry-eyed idealism, but given the maturity of most CAD apps today, where else are they going to go? Ending up like Ashlar and seeming to be in its twilight, or trying to extract every cent from the asset until everything that's currently proprietary can be done by open-source SW anyway? That proposition looked a little absurb a decade ago, not now. Why am I still using PunchCAD and TurboCAD? GUIs that are easier to use and more convenient than FreeCAD. Rhino's still doing novel stuff with NURBS, but until I see what's in V14, I think that recent new versions of Punch and TC are cleaning up utility rather than blazing new trails - some missteps bug-wise aside.
Edited by user Wednesday, November 30, 2022 8:02:58 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified