Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Solid Modeling
»
bug - two rail sweep solid (#2319)
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC) Posts: 757
hello,
Bug? with two rail sweep solid?
Also with option, to maintain height.
See the attach file please.
regard.
Antoine
la mouche attached the following image(s):
Image 2.jpg
(32kb) downloaded 4 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Administration
Joined: 7/29/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 87 time(s) in 81 post(s)
Hi Antoine Can you post the geometry/file you tried to use? Regards Jason
Windows 11, 10
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC) Posts: 978
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Jason,
Antoine has already reported this bug and posted an example.
See this post from 4 months ago. - Steve
Rank: Administration
Joined: 7/29/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 87 time(s) in 81 post(s)
Hi Antoine
The 2 rail sweep seems better if you move the profile slightly inside (.006") the sweep profiles. See attached file. (I moved the sweep profile in toward the center of the ellipse rails.
Instead of the profile just touching the edge of the sweep rails. If I move them less than .006 it gives and Acis error and creates the bad sweep you first had.
Regards
Jason
File Attachment(s):
2railsweep.slt
(145kb) downloaded 4 time(s). jdi000 attached the following image(s):
sweeps.jpg
(18kb) downloaded 4 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Windows 11, 10
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC) Posts: 978
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Jason,
Originally Posted by: jdi000 The 2 rail sweep seems better if you move the profile slightly inside (.006") the sweep profiles. See attached file. (I moved the sweep profile in toward the center of the ellipse rails.
:D
I will take your post as a light hearted joke.
- Steve
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC) Posts: 2,156
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Likewise JD ! .. though I'm quite sure it's intended to be helpful for Tim to understand what is going awry
Rank: Administration
Joined: 7/29/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 87 time(s) in 81 post(s)
Jol It seems if the swept profile has 2 vertices lying on the rails to be swept and the profile is outside the sweep rails its has an acis error and then does not draw the sweep as shown by Antoine's file. Jason
Windows 11, 10
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC) Posts: 978
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi Jason, You can work around this by splitting the rail curves, that is IF, the resulting curves are not changed to other curve types , or half the curve is not deleted and if then those curves remain with original tangent endpoints. There can be far too many "Ifs" and "Buts" with VC/shark. This problem and others related have been reported numerous times, and Tim appears to just avoid the subject/issues. - Steve
Rank: Junior Member
Joined: 4/20/2009(UTC) Posts: 29
Steve,
you are right!!!!
b Regards Ed
dudko attached the following image(s):
elipse.jpg
(51kb) downloaded 4 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 4/1/2007(UTC) Posts: 1,583
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Steve.M There can be far too many "Ifs" and "Buts" with VC/shark.
:eek:
LOL!! :D:D
see my other post =>
HERE (sorry to rub it in Tim, but Steve, et al, have got a very good point, don't you think? ;) )
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC) Posts: 978
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Well, It looks like this will be ignored yet again. Maybe these bugs (and others) are beyond the capabilities of the programmers to fix? or that they just cannot be bothered? or not enough users make reports? or ? For a program like Shark, with problems like this, well, very bad. - Steve
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC) Posts: 2,156
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I imagine it's more a matter of prioritising resources !? That said, a critical part of the work is done .. calling out these short-falls in functionality. Well done to everybody for this very important work ! So, now the flag has clearly been raised on this tool - I hope the time is found to address it's failings
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC) Posts: 978
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: jol I imagine it's more a matter of prioritising resources !?
I can understand that resources are limited, but if Shark6 is released with these basic tools not functioning correctly, then I for one would certainly not even contemplate upgrading, ever.
- Stem
Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Solid Modeling
»
bug - two rail sweep solid (#2319)
Forum Jump
Punch! CAD
ViaCAD & Shark
- News and Announcements
- General
- 2D Drafting
- Surface Modeling
- Solid Modeling
- Subdivision Modeling
- Rendering & Display
- Import/Export
- Tips and Tutorials
- Suggestions
- Gallery
- PowerPack
- Punch Lounge
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.