Hi,
I asked the question and got a response back. I then looked for more info on how to interpret SAT file data strings and found this link
https://paulbourke.net/dataformats/sat/sat.pdfThe header string contains various sub strings to identify the file aka
Save File Header
Topic: *SAT Save and Restore
The first record of the ACIS save file is a header, such as:
712 0 4 0 11 Scheme AIDE 11 ACIS 7.0 NT 24 Mon Apr 09 16:44:18 2001 -1 9.9999999999999995e-007 1e-010
SAT Format D 7.0
...... An encoded version number. In the example, this is “712”, which means the release is major release 7, minor release 1, and point release 2.
...... The total number of saved data records, or zero. If zero, then an end mark is required.
...... A count of the number of entities in the original entity list that were saved to the part file.
...... The least significant bit of this number is used to indicate whether or not history has been saved in this save file.
...... String length for the product string: “11”.
...... ID for the product which produced the file: “Scheme AIDE”. ...... String length for the ACIS version string: “11”.
...... ACIS version which produced the file: “ACIS 7.0 NT”. This may be different from the file version and can include the major release number, the minor release number, and the point release number. It also includes the platform on which it was produced.
...... String length for the date string: “24”.
...... Date file produced (in C ctime format): “Mon Apr 09 16:44:18 2001”.
...... Number of millimeters represented by each unit in the model: “-1”.
...... Value of resabs when the file was produced: “9.9999999999999995e-007”. Real . . .
...... Value of resnor when the file was produced: “1e-10”.
so if you look at the header file from damhave's file aka
10 Techsoft3D 15 ACIS 5.0 Darwin 25 Wed May 8 16:39:50 2024_ 1000 9.999999999999999547e-07 1.000000000000000036e-10
so it was produced by Techsoft 3D. and is an ACIS 5 format and the units are "1000", which is a little odd.
What it does suggest however and the response is not mine, is that maybe the other folks have made a mistake and nobody has picked up on it yet.
Mike