logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
go3d  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:26:59 PM(UTC)
go3d

Rank: Member

Joined: 4/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 60

Has anyone on the forum got any experience with using Shark/VC for a reverse engineering job. i.e. taking scanned data of a part, importing the stl mesh into Shark/VC and then creating the surfaces/solids.

Bearing in mind that the surfaces created need to be true to the imported mesh shape, I would be interested to hear any advice on techniques you may be able to share or potential pitfalls you know of.
Is it best to start by cutting multiple sections?

Thanks!
zumer  
#2 Posted : Saturday, October 2, 2010 10:26:13 AM(UTC)
zumer

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 515

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Been there, done that. A facet representation, mesh or .stl, is going to have to be rebuilt. Flat faces are easy enough, but cylindrical, conical or curved surfaces are going to have to be analysed and recreated from scratch, unless your budget stretches to some dedicated mesh-to-surface software. I noticed that in the release notes for 929, Tim says that coplanar triangle facets will be consolidated into faces in Sketchup import. That'd be a useful starting option for rebuilding any mesh or facet format model for editing, even doing it manually is the most logical start to your job, because then you can make more sense of how the curved features relate to them. Cylindrical features are easiest to recreate of curved features, sweeping lines along three point arcs or circles. The hardest thing about rebuilding .stls is that facet representations of features aren't recognised as features, because .stl was never intended to be an editable format, only an easily manufacturable representation of a model. Rebuilding from slices is possible, but often harder work than rebuilding features from vertices.
go3d  
#3 Posted : Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:10:04 PM(UTC)
go3d

Rank: Member

Joined: 4/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 60

Hi Zumer,

Thanks for your advice. I guess I was hoping that Shark might have something along the lines of Rapidform XOR.
Take a look at the attached PDF if you are interested.

Perhaps it could be considered for future Shark versions?
Rapidform XOR is not available for Mac. :(
File Attachment(s):
SurfaceModeling_BoundaryFit.pdf (843kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.